# Galaga CPC

**URL:** <https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/t/galaga-cpc/858>\
**Category:** AI remakes\
**Created:** [October 4, 2026, 12:40pm UTC](https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/t/galaga-cpc/858 "2026-10-04T12:40:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BSC](https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/user_avatar/forum.cpcwiki.eu/bsc/32/23_2.png) [@BSC](https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/u/BSC)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2026, 7:22pm UTC](https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/t/galaga-cpc/858/4 "2026-10-04T19:22:22Z")

</div>

> [@AI mega thread](https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/t/ai-mega-thread/743/5):
>
> Claude to re-read, criticize and rewrite parts.

Then maybe that’s what I smelled in your post? This and the structure (markdown sections) just made it look like an AI response copy-pasted. And in all honesty, after skimming the post and sensing that AI vibe I did not actually and fully read it, so I overlooked the _… I asked Claude to …_ My bad.

Don’t get me wrong, though. I am not against using AI for research (I do this a lot), but imo it should be clearly flagged as such (and not hidden somewhere in the middle of a post) when sharing the results online.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/t/galaga-cpc/858)._