# SEGA's Flicky for CPC

**URL:** <https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/t/segas-flicky-for-cpc/698>\
**Category:** Videos\
**Created:** [October 6, 2026, 5:18am UTC](https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/t/segas-flicky-for-cpc/698 "2026-10-06T05:18:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 44

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RETO\_AMSTRAD](https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/user_avatar/forum.cpcwiki.eu/reto_amstrad/32/61_2.png) [@RETO\_AMSTRAD](https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/u/RETO_AMSTRAD)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2026, 12:05pm UTC](https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/t/segas-flicky-for-cpc/698/44 "2026-10-12T12:05:25Z")

</div>

“@XeNoMoRPH good job. The debate to separate the type of development isn’t here, but rather in the AI thread [AI mega thread](https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/t/ai-mega-thread/743) . The whole point is to discuss it once and for all and not get everything bogged down. All that needs to be done is to post it with the right tag. Whether it’s AI or not depends on whether the author declares it. I don’t think there’s any bad faith if they relied on it for some aspect. Hence, this scene needs to define what counts as “assistance,” “full development by AI,” or completely “handcrafted.” It’s good that the catalog is expanding.

I’m noting this down for the live streams.”

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.cpcwiki.eu/t/segas-flicky-for-cpc/698)._